| From | Message |
DC
Dec 15, 2008
10:16 PM | Kudos to DC for the best fields we have played on in a few years. I wouldn`t return our Richmond fields until we have turf like DC does.
Great move! |
agreed
Dec 15, 2008
10:32 PM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
Richmond can talk all the smack they want about their teams and 804 bs but 703 did come with the bourgeois nice fields.
|
yeah
Dec 15, 2008
10:59 PM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
Yo, yo, yo, and some of you ebonic bros fit right in with us. It all good in the hood. |
to dc
Dec 16, 2008
06:06 AM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
yeah, fields were nice but they were confusing.. too many lines, and they were off-set by 20 yds.. i seen plenty off times, a player would stop runnin cause he thought he was in the endzone. |
re: to DC
Dec 16, 2008
07:45 AM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
yeah they need to adjust the state rule of 80yd fields. I mean if we have that many fields that are 100yds why shorten it?? |
Not DC
Dec 16, 2008
08:27 AM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
Most of the fields were in NOVA not DC , but they were all in good shape.Need to play 100 yards , not 80.Too confusing |
Line em up right!
Dec 16, 2008
10:48 AM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
If fields were lined in 10`s like always when playing on reg fields, wouldn`t be a problem! Me thinks. |
richmond observer
Dec 16, 2008
6:48 PM | subject: re: Hosting and Fields
the fields were great accept the markings, twelve fields in a twenty mile area. (goal,20,40,20,goal ie. markings) |